Thursday, July 05, 2012

Mitt Romney's health care conundrum

In a nutshell, and in the candidate's own words:
“Actually, the chief justice in his opinion made it very clear that at the state level, states have the power to put in place mandates. They don’t need to require them to be called taxes in order for them to be constitutional. And as a result, Massachusetts’ mandate was a mandate, was a penalty, was described that way by the Legislature and by me, and so it stays as it was.”
Republicans were right.  The court's ruling could be the nail in the coffin on this race.  Problem for them is that it's the nail in Romney's coffin.  He can't talk about his own health care reforms vis-a-vis the Affordable Care Act without sounding like a two-faced hypocrite.

Romney's got a decent record as a good government, Midwestern/New England-style Republican.  Except now the base wants some fire-breathing, government-hating madman that typically only wins in the South, and Romney is stuck being someone he's not in an attempt to pander for votes.  Mitt Romney from ten years ago would be a much more difficult general election opponent for President Obama.  Too bad the GOP is too blind to see it.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I would agree with you in theory. However, I think Romney is going to get his cake and get to eat it too. Health care should have cost him the primary, I don't think it will cost him the general. The far right is so modivated to get rid of Obama I don't think it will matter who the other candidate is. They will show up and vote, and I think the independents and the moderates are going to break for Romney too. My guess would be Obama's days are numbered, but it will be close.

 
(c) free template